Journal:

Article Title: Nir2, a Novel Regulator of Cell Morphogenesis

doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.8.2650-2662.2002

Figure Lengend Snippet: Nir2 attenuates Rho-mediated neurite retraction in TE671 cells. TE671 cells grown on coverslips were transiently transfected with expression vectors encoding either wild-type RhoA (Myc tagged), dominant negative Rho (N19Rho; Myc tagged), Nir2 (HA tagged), or green fluorescent protein (GFP) or cotransfected with Nir2 and RhoA. Fifteen hours later, the cells were treated with dbcAMP for 8 h, fixed, and either immunostained with anti-HA or anti-Myc antibodies or costained with anti-Myc and anti-Rho antibodies. (A and B) Representative phenotypes of cells expressing RhoA, Nir2, N19Rho, or GFP (A) (bar, 50 μm), along with a quantitative analysis of neurite extensions in cells expressing the indicated proteins (B). Neurite extensions were measured with Zeiss 510 confocal microscope operating software (version 2.01). Shown are the means ± standard deviations obtained from more than 30 cells expressing the indicated proteins. (C) Representative confocal images of cells that coexpress Nir2 (green) and RhoA (red) and the merged images. Coexpression appears in yellow. Note that neurite extensions are more pronounced in Rho-expressing cells that strongly express Nir2. Bar, 50 μm.

Article Snippet: Image analysis was performed using the standard system operating software provided with the Zeiss 510 microscope (version 2.01). fig ft0 fig mode=article f1 fig/graphic|fig/alternatives/graphic mode="anchored" m1 Open in a separate window FIG. 3. caption a7 Rid inhibits Rho. (A) Rid inhibits Rho-mediated stress fiber formation.

Techniques: Transfection, Expressing, Dominant Negative Mutation, Microscopy, Software

Journal:

Article Title: Defining Accelerometer Thresholds for Activity Intensities in Adolescent Girls

doi:

Figure Lengend Snippet: V̇0 2 , MET score, and accelerometer counts for each activity

Article Snippet: MET = 2.01 + 0.00171 ( counts ⋅ 30 S − 1 ) MET = 2.01 + 0.000856 ( counts ⋅ 60 S − 1 ) [2] fig ft0 fig mode=article f1 fig/graphic|fig/alternatives/graphic mode="anchored" m1 Open in a separate window FIGURE 1 caption a7 Regression line for MET score versus accelerometer (Actigraph) counts (random regression line for each girl and overall regression line). fig ft0 fig mode=article f1 fig/graphic|fig/alternatives/graphic mode="anchored" m1 Open in a separate window FIGURE 2 caption a7 Regression line and 95% CI for MET score versus accelerometer counts.

Techniques: Activity Assay

Journal:

Article Title: Defining Accelerometer Thresholds for Activity Intensities in Adolescent Girls

doi:

Figure Lengend Snippet: Regression line for MET score versus accelerometer (Actigraph) counts (random regression line for each girl and overall regression line).

Article Snippet: MET = 2.01 + 0.00171 ( counts ⋅ 30 S − 1 ) MET = 2.01 + 0.000856 ( counts ⋅ 60 S − 1 ) [2] fig ft0 fig mode=article f1 fig/graphic|fig/alternatives/graphic mode="anchored" m1 Open in a separate window FIGURE 1 caption a7 Regression line for MET score versus accelerometer (Actigraph) counts (random regression line for each girl and overall regression line). fig ft0 fig mode=article f1 fig/graphic|fig/alternatives/graphic mode="anchored" m1 Open in a separate window FIGURE 2 caption a7 Regression line and 95% CI for MET score versus accelerometer counts.

Techniques:

Journal:

Article Title: Defining Accelerometer Thresholds for Activity Intensities in Adolescent Girls

doi:

Figure Lengend Snippet: Regression line and 95% CI for MET score versus accelerometer counts.

Article Snippet: MET = 2.01 + 0.00171 ( counts ⋅ 30 S − 1 ) MET = 2.01 + 0.000856 ( counts ⋅ 60 S − 1 ) [2] fig ft0 fig mode=article f1 fig/graphic|fig/alternatives/graphic mode="anchored" m1 Open in a separate window FIGURE 1 caption a7 Regression line for MET score versus accelerometer (Actigraph) counts (random regression line for each girl and overall regression line). fig ft0 fig mode=article f1 fig/graphic|fig/alternatives/graphic mode="anchored" m1 Open in a separate window FIGURE 2 caption a7 Regression line and 95% CI for MET score versus accelerometer counts.

Techniques:

Journal:

Article Title: Defining Accelerometer Thresholds for Activity Intensities in Adolescent Girls

doi:

Figure Lengend Snippet: Choosing the threshold for moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity by examining the false positives and false negatives based for approach 2 (eight activities)

Article Snippet: MET = 2.01 + 0.00171 ( counts ⋅ 30 S − 1 ) MET = 2.01 + 0.000856 ( counts ⋅ 60 S − 1 ) [2] fig ft0 fig mode=article f1 fig/graphic|fig/alternatives/graphic mode="anchored" m1 Open in a separate window FIGURE 1 caption a7 Regression line for MET score versus accelerometer (Actigraph) counts (random regression line for each girl and overall regression line). fig ft0 fig mode=article f1 fig/graphic|fig/alternatives/graphic mode="anchored" m1 Open in a separate window FIGURE 2 caption a7 Regression line and 95% CI for MET score versus accelerometer counts.

Techniques: Activity Assay, Biomarker Discovery

Journal:

Article Title: Defining Accelerometer Thresholds for Activity Intensities in Adolescent Girls

doi:

Figure Lengend Snippet: Choosing the threshold for moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity by examining the false positives and false negatives based for approach 3 (slow and brisk walking)

Article Snippet: MET = 2.01 + 0.00171 ( counts ⋅ 30 S − 1 ) MET = 2.01 + 0.000856 ( counts ⋅ 60 S − 1 ) [2] fig ft0 fig mode=article f1 fig/graphic|fig/alternatives/graphic mode="anchored" m1 Open in a separate window FIGURE 1 caption a7 Regression line for MET score versus accelerometer (Actigraph) counts (random regression line for each girl and overall regression line). fig ft0 fig mode=article f1 fig/graphic|fig/alternatives/graphic mode="anchored" m1 Open in a separate window FIGURE 2 caption a7 Regression line and 95% CI for MET score versus accelerometer counts.

Techniques: Activity Assay, Biomarker Discovery

Journal:

Article Title: Defining Accelerometer Thresholds for Activity Intensities in Adolescent Girls

doi:

Figure Lengend Snippet: Summary of intensity threshold counts for sedentary, light, moderate, and vigorous physical activity (PA) for the Actigraph accelerometer

Article Snippet: MET = 2.01 + 0.00171 ( counts ⋅ 30 S − 1 ) MET = 2.01 + 0.000856 ( counts ⋅ 60 S − 1 ) [2] fig ft0 fig mode=article f1 fig/graphic|fig/alternatives/graphic mode="anchored" m1 Open in a separate window FIGURE 1 caption a7 Regression line for MET score versus accelerometer (Actigraph) counts (random regression line for each girl and overall regression line). fig ft0 fig mode=article f1 fig/graphic|fig/alternatives/graphic mode="anchored" m1 Open in a separate window FIGURE 2 caption a7 Regression line and 95% CI for MET score versus accelerometer counts.

Techniques: Activity Assay